Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Commentary Test

1. Synopsis
Article: Deaf to the World

This article describes how many people, mostly teens, are so glued to their cellphones or music players that they face a much greater risk of accidents. Reporters conducted a test where they deliberately walked into those sending text messages and rang bicycle bells behind those listening to MP3 players. Majority did not avoid the reporters or hear the bells. However, they were still indifferent to the danger they were putting themselves in. This article raised one of the many dangers of addiction to technology.

2. Commentary
Teens and Tech: The Danger of Addiction

Many teens nowadays are extremely technology-savvy. Before, computer programming language was a thing only for adults; nowadays it is commonplace for 13-year-olds to be proficient in many different styles of coding. Recently, a nine-year-old Singaporean child wrote a program for the iPhone that receives 4000 downloads in less than two weeks. As amazing as this may seem, one soon asks, “Is my teen addicted to tech?”

It is true that the explosion in the advancement of technology over the past decade has brought many dangers to our children. One such danger is cyber-gaming. Recent studies in the US have shown that teens play between 8-14 hours of computer games per week [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_addiction]. Worse, many deaths have been associated with gaming. In 2005, a South Korean citizen named Lee Seung Seop entered a cyber-gaming cafe and played the popular game Starcraft for 50 hours, before going into cardiac arrest. It is obvious that cyber-gaming has the potential to become a major addiction in our children’s lives, possibly affecting their studies and their social life.

Pornography is also another danger. To give you an idea of how addictive pornography is, here are some shocking statistics: Every second, 28 258 web users are viewing pornography and $3,075.64 is being spent on it. The pornography industry is larger than the combined revenue of Microsoft, Google, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo and many other companies [http://www.internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com/internet-pornography-statistics.html]. The porn that spreads like a virus over the Internet is more than just a picture of a few models; it is mind-numbing stuff. With the ease of access teens have to the web, it is inevitable that they will stumble across some form of pornography or another.

Even though technology has its dangers, it also has its benefits. Nowadays, students can easily churn out long essays, thanks to the power of the word processor. Before the invention of email, students had to painstakingly type each word with a type-writer or worse, write out by hand. Now, huge 100-page science reports fly around cyberspace effortlessly, saving money, time and trees. The Internet is also an excellent tool for the dissemination of information to the school population; it is now possible to notify students of, say, changes to the rubrics of a project during the school holidays.

Since technology brings about many benefits, how then do we handle its dangers? My policy has always been one word: caution. Always be cautious when it comes to the Internet, or the cell phone. We should aim to inculcate this value in our teens by teaching them the right stuff. Preach the dangers of gaming and pornography to them. You can also establish certain ground rules to prevent addiction from occurring; placing your computer in the living room is a good way to ensure your teen doesn’t do anything suspicious on the Internet. Set time limits on when and for how long your teen should play computer games. In short, keep up to date with advances in technology and keep a cautious eye on your teens. This policy has worked for me, I’m sure it will work for you.

In conclusion, technology has brought teens many benefits but it also brings about many dangers; these dangers can be easily handled if parents of teens keep a close watch on their teens.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Singapore Strays: To cull or not to cull?

I'm sure all of you have seen strays before (or heard them, in some cases). The cats that roam about the streets at night, that topple your rubbish bins, that mate noisily on the roof. Nevertheless, it is an heartwarming sight to see them grooming themselves or mewing happily at the moon.

However, the cat population, when not controlled, can compound and increase out of control: a pair of mating cats can produce up to 324 progeny every 2 years. This can lead to many issues for the public: cats can become rather territorial and will caterwaul and fight at night. They can also scratch or injure members of the public, being overly defensive. Cats will also defecate and urinate freely, creating hygiene problems. Thus, the AVA culls 13,000 cats every year; it has been doing so for the past 20 years.

It is strange to me that our leaders often call for us to be more compassionate, more courteous, but actively continue to cull these innocent cats in large numbers. To quote Ms Geraldine Soh Geok Lian, in her letter to the Straits Times Forums:
"As a country with First World infrastructure, the town council's aim of a stray-less Tampines shows Singapore's backward mentality, lacking in the compassion Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong wishes to inculcate in our countrymen."

Is mindless culling really the only way to control these animals? I think not. Surely there must be some more humane way to control these furry animals.

Even the government knows this; the Stray Cat Rehabilitation Scheme (SCRS) was established to control the cat population by capturing, sterilising and then releasing stray cats. The AVA even began announcing the success of the scheme and the benefits of sterilisation. However, the AVA issued this statement a few months after announcing the Scheme's success: "The Scheme is not working well, and AVA has received an increased number of complaints related to stray cats [...] the Scheme has been suspended pending further review..." This statement was made in 2003.

So we keep culling cats while we think of a solution? The inconsistency of the AVA leaves me in doubt as to whether they are sincerely concerned about solving this issue in a humane manner.

Surely there must be some way to solve this problem?










http://www.wildsingapore.com/news/20051112/051118-2.htm
http://www.ava.gov.sg/NR/rdonlyres/A92C9FE2-A523-450B-9F62-B3564E699F25/8487/attach52.pdf